determined force, instead of amplitude parameters usually
attributed to this type of assay [20], since reproducibility can
be compromised due slight changes in sample dimensions. By
this way, submitting each specimen to a specific force of 1 N
will
guarantee
an
accurate
homogeneous
comparison
between them.
12. The 1 N was applied 3 times per day, each time during 1 h, with
each new application preceded by a 1 h constraint-free rest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thanks to UFSCar-Sorocaba/PPGBMA for support
and to CAPES grant 1724839.
References
1. Kingsley G (2001) Tissue engineering. In:
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technol-
ogy.
Academic
Press,
Cambridge,
Massachusetts, pp 133–143
2. Paez-Mayorga J, Herna´ndez-Vargas G, Ruiz-
Esparza GU, Iqbal HMN, Wang X, Zhang YS,
Parra-Saldivar R, Khademhosseini A (2019)
Bioreactors for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv
Healthc Mater 8(7):e1701504. https://doi.
org/10.1002/adhm.201701504.
Epub
2018 May 8
3. Schu¨rlein S, Al Hijailan R, Weigel T, Kadari A,
Ru¨cker C, Edenhofer F, Walles H, Hansmann J
(2017) Generation of a human cardiac patch
based on a Reendothelialized biological scaf-
fold (BioVaSc). Adv Biosys 1(3):1600005
4. Grodzinsky AJ, Levenston ME, Jin M, Frank
EH (2000) Cartilage tissue remodeling in
response to mechanical forces. Annu Rev
Biomed Eng 2:691–713. https://doi.org/10.
1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.691
5. Cartmell S, El Haj A (2005) Mechanical bior-
eactors
for
bone
tissue
engineering.
In:
Chaudhuri J, Al-Rubeai M (eds) Bioreactors
for tissue engineering. Dordrecht, Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3741-4_8
6. Pedrini F, Hausen M, Gomes R, Duek E
(2020) Enhancement of cartilage extracellular
matrix synthesis in poly(PCL-TMC)urethane
scaffolds: a study of oriented dynamic flow in
bioreactor.
Biotechnol
Lett
42
(12):2721–2734.
https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10529-020-02983-1. Epub 2020 Aug 12
7. Han TTY, Flynn LE (2020) Perfusion bioreac-
tor culture of human adipose-derived stromal
cells on decellularized adipose tissue scaffolds
enhances in vivo adipose tissue regeneration. J
Tissue Eng Regen Med 14(12):1827–1840.
https://doi.org/10.1002/term.3133
8. Bhaskar B, Owen R, Bahmaee H et al (2018)
Design and assessment of a dynamic perfusion
bioreactor for large bone tissue engineering
scaffolds.
Appl
Biochem
Biotechnol
185:555–563.
https://doi.org/10.1007/
s12010-017-2671-5
9. Schmid J, Schwarz S, Meier-Staude R et al
(2018) A perfusion bioreactor system for cell
seeding and oxygen-controlled cultivation of
three-dimensional cell cultures. Tissue Eng
Part C Methods 24(10):585–595. https://
doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0204
10. Li D, Tang T, Lu J, Dai K (2009) Effects of
flow shear stress and mass transport on the
construction of a large-scale tissue-engineered
bone in a perfusion bioreactor. Tissue Eng Part
A
15(10):2773–2783.
https://doi.org/10.
1089/ten.TEA.2008.0540
11. Yeatts AB, Fisher JP (2011) Bone tissue engi-
neering bioreactors: dynamic culture and the
influence of shear stress. Bone 48(2):171–181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.09.
138. Epub 2010 Oct 13
12. Rotenberg MY, Ruvinov E, Armoza A, Cohen
S (2012) A multi-shear perfusion bioreactor
for investigating shear stress effects in endothe-
lial
cell
constructs.
Lab
Chip
12
(15):2696–2703.
https://doi.org/10.1039/
c2lc40144d. Epub 2012 May 23
13. McCoy RJ, O’Brien FJ (2010) Influence of
shear stress in perfusion bioreactor cultures
for
the development of three-dimensional
bone tissue constructs: a review. Tissue Eng
Optimized Dynamics in Bioreactors System
133